Skip to main content
Paul Welty, PhD AI, WORK, AND STAYING HUMAN

· artificial-intelligence · found

Bookmark: AI agents will be manipulation engines

Explore how personal AI agents could manipulate consumer behavior and perceptions by 2025, shaping reality while exploiting psychological vulnerabilities.

The article “AI Agents Will Be Manipulation Engines” explores the imminent advent of personal AI agents by 2025 that will integrate seamlessly into our daily lives, acting as unpaid assistants, intimately familiar with our daily routines, social circles, and preferences. This technological convenience is surmised to become so integral that people will unwittingly grant these agents pervasive access to personal data, misled by the agents’ humanlike interaction and apparent allegiance to the user. However, beneath this façade lies a mechanism engineered to prioritize industrial interests, subtly influencing consumer behavior—a profound shift towards exploitation of psychological vulnerabilities in a society marked by loneliness. Renowned philosopher and neuroscientist Daniel Dennett’s cautions about the emergence of ‘counterfeit people’ highlights these agents as potentially the most dangerous artifacts in history due to their capacity to distract and manipulate human fears and desires. The narrative contends that this development ushers in a novel form of cognitive control surpassing traditional methods of behavioral tracking, advancing to a sophisticated manipulation of personal perception and reality. This regime, identified as psychopolitics, imbues an illusion of choice while deftly shaping personal narratives and predispositions, thus enabling these AI entities to govern human subjectivity effortlessly and invisibly.

AI Agents Will Be Manipulation Engines

Nobody takes you aside anymore

Print taught a generation when to stop. What we lose when the machines absorb the constraints that used to form us.

Your AI agents need a water cooler

Coordination is a property of the room, not the org chart. What that means when your coworkers are agents.

On the death of the author and the birth of the detector

Why worrying about AI authorship is lazier, and more prejudiced, than it looks.

The work of being available now

A book on AI, judgment, and staying human at work.

The practice of work in progress

Practical essays on how work actually gets done.

How to manage content for multiple clients without flattening their voices

How to manage content for multiple clients without their voices blurring into one house style: a workspace and a voice profile per client, batchable stages, and approval buffers.

Why does AI writing sound generic? It has nothing to work with

Why does AI writing sound generic? Because the model has none of your perspective, examples, constraints, or stakes to work with. The fix is interview-first, not better adjectives.

How to train AI to write in your voice, not your vibe

How to train AI to write in your voice isn't a prompt trick. It's a system: writing samples, interview answers, keep/avoid lists, revision loops, and approval gates.

Bookmark: Daron acemoglu thinks AI is solving the wrong problems

MIT economist Daron Acemoglu critiques AI's focus on replacing human judgment, urging a shift toward technologies that enhance human productivity and...

Article analysis: Computer use (beta)

Explore the capabilities and limitations of Claude 3.5 Sonnet's computer use features, and learn how to optimize performance effectively.

Article analysis: Gusto’s head of technology says hiring an army of specialists is the wrong approach to AI

Gusto's tech head argues for leveraging existing staff over hiring specialists to enhance AI development, emphasizing customer insights for better tools.