Branding and Human Cognition
We are essentializing beings. That is, our way of knowing the world tends heavily towards looking for the essential, the typical, and the regular. We tend to see the general, the core, the one single “thing” that summarizes, encapsulates, or explains what we’re looking at.
And this is the core thought behind the importance of branding.
This post will discuss something that is at the heart of everything we do as human beings. It also shows why we have marketing and branding companies at all. Finally, it shows why I love this business so much.
We are essentializing beings. That is, our way of knowing the world tends heavily towards looking for the essential, the typical, and the regular. We tend to see the general, the core, the one single “thing” that summarizes, encapsulates, or explains what we’re looking at.
And this is the core thought behind the importance of branding.
With a person, it’s the person’s “character” that we can see among all the details of their everyday life. Similarly, with a company, it’s the “brand” of that company that we see.
This sort of essentializing is not voluntary. We just tend to do it, because of how our human experiencing works. We need some general, reliable data to anchor our experience. We can’t function without this keystone. The essence “holds together” our experience by continually tying it together with some key ideas. (If you’d like to know more about this theory of experience, and its origin in Aristotle and Husserl, just let me know.)
So, it’s not that we would like a person to have a character, it’s that we expect and look for a person’s character. When we look for this essence of the person, his/her character, we look for what’s the true nature of the person, what s/he is “really like”. If we can’t find one, it’s confusing and awkward. We say this person “has no character”.
And it’s the same way with companies. To us humans, a company is surprisingly like a person. It has a name. It seems to be taking action in the world. And so, we expect it will have an essence. Not a character exactly. But, for a company, we expect it to have a brand. We are looking for what’s essential about a company. And when we find nothing, to apply Stein’s observation about Oakland, we might say “There is no there there.”
Thus, a company’s brand is not some veneer laid on top of its true operations. A company’s brand is its true nature. We need the brand to fully understand the company. Thus, good branding is identifying and revealing what’s essentially true about a company. And good communications is ensuring that everyone gets the right message.
Featured writing
When your brilliant idea meets organizational reality: a survival guide
Is your cutting-edge AI strategy being derailed by organizational inertia? Discover how to navigate the chasm between visionary ideas and entrenched corporate realities.
Server-Side Dashboard Architecture: Why Moving Data Fetching Off the Browser Changes Everything
How choosing server-side rendering solved security, CORS, and credential management problems I didn't know I had.
AI as Coach: Transforming Professional and Continuing Education
In continuing education, learning doesn’t end when the course is completed. Professionals, executives, and lifelong learners often require months of follow-up, guidance, and reinforcement to fully integrate new knowledge into their work and personal lives. Traditionally, human coaches have filled this role—whether in leadership development, career advancement, corporate training, or personal growth. However, the cost and accessibility of one-on-one coaching remain significant barriers. AI-driven coaching has the potential to bridge this gap, providing continuous, personalized support at scale.
Books
The Work of Being (in progress)
A book on AI, judgment, and staying human at work.
The Practice of Work (in progress)
Practical essays on how work actually gets done.
Recent writing
Influence in the AI Era: Why Human Skills Still Matter
I read this and couldn't agree more: human skills are the linchpin in the age of AI. The article argues that while AI can automate tasks, it can't replicate empathy or the nuance of genuine human interaction. This isn't just about keeping jobs. It's about enhancing them. Empathy and leadership are not replaceable attributes; they are the catalysts for AI's true potential. Imagine a world where technology supports human connection rather than replaces it. Are we ready to embrace that vision, or will we let machines lead the way? Let's ensure the future remains human-centered.
Is Automation the Key to Organizational Resilience?
Automation as the backbone of resilience? This article argues it's essential, but let's not forget the human element. While automating routine tasks can indeed free up resources, it's the strategic deployment of human creativity that drives true innovation. Think of automation as the scaffolding, not the structure. The author claims automation transforms efficiency, yet the real transformation happens when we align technology with human insight. So, are we building resilience or just a faster treadmill? Let's ensure our focus remains on enriching human potential, not just replacing it.
The one-person company advantage: why coordination overhead is the new competitive liability
Imagine a marketer who single-handedly rebuilt his company's entire demand-generation engine in just six weeks using a stack of AI tools. Historically, this task would have required a small team, including a copywriter, designer, analyst, and marketing ops person. Yet, here we have a solo operator outpacing what a team of specialists used to achieve. The secret? It's not about exceptional talent; it's about the structural advantages AI tools unlock.
Notes and related thinking
Server-Side Dashboard Architecture: Why Moving Data Fetching Off the Browser Changes Everything
How choosing server-side rendering solved security, CORS, and credential management problems I didn't know I had.