Bookmark: If you’re not on the table, you’re on the menu: The ai revolution

Explore how the AI revolution shapes society, urging active participation to ensure equitable benefits and ethical development for all.

The article “If You’re Not On The Table, You’re On The Menu: The AI Revolution” by Sarim Nadeem examines the pervasive impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on society and illustrates the dichotomy between those shaping AI technologies and those who are subject to its impacts. Nadeem uses the metaphor of being “on the table” versus “on the menu” to distinguish between active participants, such as policymakers and tech leaders who direct AI’s evolution, and passive individuals who endure AI’s consequences without input. The article argues that a small, privileged group currently influences AI development and society-wide deployment, leaving many marginalized. Those “on the menu” include workers vulnerable to automation, businesses stagnant in AI adoption, and consumers unwittingly affected by AI-driven processes. To shift roles, Nadeem advocates for steps like investing in AI literacy to broaden understanding, advocating for ethical development to counter biases and privacy issues, and fostering inclusive AI ecosystems for equitable representation. Acknowledging the swift progression of AI, the article emphasizes the necessity for collective action to ensure that AI serves the whole of humanity rather than merely advantaging a select few. By promoting an ethically engaged and broadly informed approach to AI, the piece concludes that society can better govern its trajectory and mitigate potential harms If You’re Not On The Table, You’re On The Menu: The AI Revolution

Featured writing

The agent-shaped org chart

Every real org has the same topology: principal, role-holder, specialists. Staff AI maps onto it, node for node, and the cost collapse shows up in the deliverables that were always just human-handoff overhead.

AI as staff, not software

Two frames for what AI is doing to work. The tool frame makes tools smarter. The staff frame makes roles unnecessary. Those aren't the same product, the same company, or the same industry.

Knowledge work was never work

Knowledge work was always coordination between humans who couldn't share state directly. The artifacts were never the work. They were the overhead — and AI just made the overhead optional.

Books

The work of being available now

A book on AI, judgment, and staying human at work.

The practice of work in progress

Practical essays on how work actually gets done.

Recent writing

What the API decides not to show you

Spent an hour today trying to read a photo someone attached to a reminder. The bytes are right there on disk. Apple won't let me see them. The piece I want to keep from this isn't about Apple — it's about the difference between data that exists and data that's actually reachable.

What stays when the form dissolves

Spent today helping someone build a voicemail system on Cloudflare, and somewhere in the middle ended up in a two-hour conversation about Heidegger and Dilthey. Two activities, one continuous form of attention. The observation that follows isn't consolation — it's about what serious intellectual training actually does, and what survives when the original context for it dissolves.

The lede does the work

A skill correctly stated 'default to standing down.' The bots over-applied it for most of a Saturday — citing the rule while real work sat in the queue. Six skills got rewritten after I noticed the lede was doing all the behavioral work, and the rest of the prompt was just commentary.

View all writing →

Related thinking