Bookmark: A psychologist explains what Gen Z should be striving for at work (hint: not happiness)
“Triumphs in our careers are often the result of engagement, not the constant pursuit of immediate happiness.”
A psychologist explains what Gen Z should be striving for at work (hint: not happiness)
The pursuit of happiness in the workplace can be misleading for Gen Z employees entering the workforce. While happiness is often seen as equivalent to engagement, the two concepts differ significantly. Happiness, as defined by the American Psychological Association, is a fleeting emotion, whereas engagement represents a more stable and enduring state. Organizations emphasize engagement because engaged employees perform better, enhance teamwork, and remain loyal to companies. In contrast, fleeting happiness does not equate to being engaged.
Studies show Gen Z employees are the most engaged workforce segment, motivated to challenge norms and introduce new ideas. Although these behaviors may be misinterpreted as discontent, they signal genuine engagement. Long-term career happiness stems from facing challenges and achieving accomplishments, not from pursuing momentary pleasures. For sustainable fulfillment, Gen Z should focus on engagement through strategies like dedicating uninterrupted time for tasks, helping colleagues, recognizing peer achievements, and sharing ideas mindfully. Ultimately, engagement is not solely driven by management; Gen Z can proactively cultivate it, benefiting both themselves and their organizations in the quest for enduring career satisfaction.
Featured writing
When your brilliant idea meets organizational reality: a survival guide
Is your cutting-edge AI strategy being derailed by organizational inertia? Discover how to navigate the chasm between visionary ideas and entrenched corporate realities.
Server-Side Dashboard Architecture: Why Moving Data Fetching Off the Browser Changes Everything
How choosing server-side rendering solved security, CORS, and credential management problems I didn't know I had.
AI as Coach: Transforming Professional and Continuing Education
In continuing education, learning doesn’t end when the course is completed. Professionals, executives, and lifelong learners often require months of follow-up, guidance, and reinforcement to fully integrate new knowledge into their work and personal lives. Traditionally, human coaches have filled this role—whether in leadership development, career advancement, corporate training, or personal growth. However, the cost and accessibility of one-on-one coaching remain significant barriers. AI-driven coaching has the potential to bridge this gap, providing continuous, personalized support at scale.
Books
The Work of Being (in progress)
A book on AI, judgment, and staying human at work.
The Practice of Work (in progress)
Practical essays on how work actually gets done.
Recent writing
Influence in the AI Era: Why Human Skills Still Matter
I read this and couldn't agree more: human skills are the linchpin in the age of AI. The article argues that while AI can automate tasks, it can't replicate empathy or the nuance of genuine human interaction. This isn't just about keeping jobs. It's about enhancing them. Empathy and leadership are not replaceable attributes; they are the catalysts for AI's true potential. Imagine a world where technology supports human connection rather than replaces it. Are we ready to embrace that vision, or will we let machines lead the way? Let's ensure the future remains human-centered.
Is Automation the Key to Organizational Resilience?
Automation as the backbone of resilience? This article argues it's essential, but let's not forget the human element. While automating routine tasks can indeed free up resources, it's the strategic deployment of human creativity that drives true innovation. Think of automation as the scaffolding, not the structure. The author claims automation transforms efficiency, yet the real transformation happens when we align technology with human insight. So, are we building resilience or just a faster treadmill? Let's ensure our focus remains on enriching human potential, not just replacing it.
The one-person company advantage: why coordination overhead is the new competitive liability
Imagine a marketer who single-handedly rebuilt his company's entire demand-generation engine in just six weeks using a stack of AI tools. Historically, this task would have required a small team, including a copywriter, designer, analyst, and marketing ops person. Yet, here we have a solo operator outpacing what a team of specialists used to achieve. The secret? It's not about exceptional talent; it's about the structural advantages AI tools unlock.